Comments on: « New for 2010 – Rollover to Roth IRA conversions http://perfectmike.com/2010/01/18/new-for-2010-rollover-to-roth-ira-conversions/ The pursuit of being Healthy, Wealthy, and Wise. Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:45:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Howard S Samplehttp://perfectmike.com/2010/01/18/new-for-2010-rollover-to-roth-ira-conversions/comment-page-1/#comment-2302 Howard S Sample Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:22:42 +0000 http://perfectmike.com/?p=620#comment-2302 That statement regarding paying Roth conversiontaxes in 2010, is quite correct and easilyverifiable.HSS That statement regarding paying Roth conversion

taxes in 2010, is quite correct and easily

verifiable.

HSS

]]> By: Howard S Samplehttp://perfectmike.com/2010/01/18/new-for-2010-rollover-to-roth-ira-conversions/comment-page-1/#comment-2607 Howard S Sample Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:22:00 +0000 http://perfectmike.com/?p=620#comment-2607 That statement regarding paying Roth conversiontaxes in 2010, is quite correct and easilyverifiable.HSS That statement regarding paying Roth conversion

taxes in 2010, is quite correct and easily

verifiable.

HSS

]]> By: Mikehttp://perfectmike.com/2010/01/18/new-for-2010-rollover-to-roth-ira-conversions/comment-page-1/#comment-2213 Mike Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:56:36 +0000 http://perfectmike.com/?p=620#comment-2213 Hey Howard,Are you certain of this? If so, I'd like to update my article, but want to have somewhere to verify this, before I make the change. Hey Howard,

Are you certain of this? If so, I’d like to update my article, but want to have somewhere to verify this, before I make the change.

]]> By: Mikehttp://perfectmike.com/2010/01/18/new-for-2010-rollover-to-roth-ira-conversions/comment-page-1/#comment-2606 Mike Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:56:00 +0000 http://perfectmike.com/?p=620#comment-2606 Hey Howard,Are you certain of this? If so, I'd like to update my article, but want to have somewhere to verify this, before I make the change. Hey Howard,

Are you certain of this? If so, I’d like to update my article, but want to have somewhere to verify this, before I make the change.

]]> By: Howard S Samplehttp://perfectmike.com/2010/01/18/new-for-2010-rollover-to-roth-ira-conversions/comment-page-1/#comment-2212 Howard S Sample Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:14:45 +0000 http://perfectmike.com/?p=620#comment-2212 There is a fairly significant error in your latest posting on Roth IRA's, in the part where it states (in bold type) that you have "the next three years" to pay the tax liability should you convert in 2010. Actually, you can only spread it out over two years--2011 and 2012--at the most. As far as paying the taxes in 2010, that is permitted but strictly on a all-or-nothing basis. In other words, for the year 2010 you have only two options as far as the taxes--you pay either ALL of it or NONE of it.That aside, that was an informative preliminary article on the 2010 Roth conversion options. There is a fairly significant error in your latest posting on Roth IRA’s, in the part where it states (in bold type) that you have “the next three years” to pay the tax liability should you convert in 2010. Actually, you can only spread it out over two years–2011 and 2012–at the most. As far as paying the taxes in 2010, that is permitted but strictly on a all-or-nothing basis. In other words, for the year 2010 you have only two options as far as the taxes–you pay either ALL of it or NONE of it.

That aside, that was an informative preliminary article on the 2010 Roth conversion options.

]]> By: Howard S Samplehttp://perfectmike.com/2010/01/18/new-for-2010-rollover-to-roth-ira-conversions/comment-page-1/#comment-2605 Howard S Sample Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:14:00 +0000 http://perfectmike.com/?p=620#comment-2605 There is a fairly significant error in your latest posting on Roth IRA's, in the part where it states (in bold type) that you have "the next three years" to pay the tax liability should you convert in 2010. Actually, you can only spread it out over two years--2011 and 2012--at the most. As far as paying the taxes in 2010, that is permitted but strictly on a all-or-nothing basis. In other words, for the year 2010 you have only two options as far as the taxes--you pay either ALL of it or NONE of it.That aside, that was an informative preliminary article on the 2010 Roth conversion options. There is a fairly significant error in your latest posting on Roth IRA’s, in the part where it states (in bold type) that you have “the next three years” to pay the tax liability should you convert in 2010. Actually, you can only spread it out over two years–2011 and 2012–at the most. As far as paying the taxes in 2010, that is permitted but strictly on a all-or-nothing basis. In other words, for the year 2010 you have only two options as far as the taxes–you pay either ALL of it or NONE of it.

That aside, that was an informative preliminary article on the 2010 Roth conversion options.

]]>